Mars square Chiron and Mars opposition Pluto
From Trauma to Radical Change
The Mars square Chiron (Cancer – Aries) and Mars opposition Pluto (Leo – Aquarius) aspects are active during an extended period from October 2024 to the end of April 2025.
Due to Mars’ retrograde motion through Cancer and Leo during December 2024 to February 2025, these aspects occur three times. The relationships and interactions between these planets are rich in symbolism, and because of the repetition, they bring us into contact—both individually and collectively—with themes of initiative, threat, assertion, strife, desires, autonomy, in connection to vulnerability and intensity. They also highlight our perception of crises, fears, or radical changes around us, as well as our position in relation to events and group energies in the collective sphere.
Activation Dates:
Mars square Chiron:
- October 13, 2024 at 21-22 degrees Cancer/Aries
- February 4, 2025 at 19-20 degrees Cancer/Aries (Mars retrograde)
- March 26, 2025 at 21-22 degrees Cancer/Aries
Mars opposition Pluto:
- November 3, 2024 at 29 degrees Cancer/Capricorn
- January 3, 2025 at 01-02 degrees Leo/Aquarius (Mars retrograde)
- April 27, 2025 at 03-04 degrees Leo/Aquarius
The Achilles’ Heel and the Sword of Damocles within a broader conceptual framework seem like appropriate metaphors, that describe the transformation of internal vulnerabilities into external dangers.
Our vulnerabilities often become the starting point of a perceived Threat
The Achilles’ Heel symbolizes a hidden internal flaw that may seem insignificant at first, but if revealed, can become the reason for downfall or make us vulnerable. The internal weaknesses of an individual, group, system, or society often remain concealed until a crisis emerges, bringing them to the surface. In astrological terms, these planetary transits (Mars square Chiron and Mars opposition Pluto) can trigger such crises or anxieties, where our hidden vulnerabilities are exposed in the heat of conflict, struggle, or external pressures.
In this context, the challenge is that we may not always be aware of our vulnerabilities until they are put to the test, often through external forces that seem to act as catalysts. This is how the weakness itself can become a foundation for a larger threat to our well-being, whether on a personal or collective level.
How the Threat Becomes a Reflection of Weakness
The Sword of Damocles represents the external manifestation of danger that comes from this weakness. When a system has an inherent flaw, it gradually attracts external threats. The sword remains above the head as long as the weakness remains unresolved, creating a constant sense of threat. Our personal fears or weaknesses, if not addressed, often transform into external obstacles, either as self-fulfilling prophecies or as opportunities that others may exploit.
The same happens in every system—political, social, and economic.
Internal weaknesses often manifest as external threats because what is hidden inside, sooner or later, is revealed and finds a way to threaten us. The connection between the Achilles’ Heel and the Sword of Damocles shows us that real security comes not from avoiding external threats, but from addressing internal weaknesses. The magnification of external threats can serve as an avoidance mechanism to prevent us from confronting our internal flaws. The internal flaws of every system. This strategy can be conscious or unconscious and is applied both individually and collectively. We continuously experience and observe the escalation of this strategy and during the periods when these planetary aspects are active, it becomes more evident. These aspects will trigger and surface deeper wounds.
We observe very strongly in the world the mechanism of shifting responsibility, lack of accountability, which is also part of the backdrop of the slower moving planets (especially Saturn and Neptune in late Pisces).
When someone cannot or does not want to confront an internal weakness, finding or even creating an external enemy can provide a psychological outlet. Instead of acknowledging a weakness, we blame someone else for it. We construct or exaggerate a threat to justify our faults or failures. We create the need to rally around an external enemy. These mechanisms imply an intention to maintain unity and identity without addressing the deeper issues that need to be dealt with.
Continue reading
Aries Point 